Register/ Login   
Submit Mobile RSS Java Script Feed  
Home Blogs Spotlight Videos Movies Cartoon Photos Submit Media Space  Feed Directory 
World |  National |  Entertainment |  General |  Columnist


Published on 05-07-2008 In General
Viewed 2003 times
How US is manipulating oil prices, and how UPA still wants to embrace it
Written by
Nilotpal Basu
India seems to be moving through one of the most bizarre phases of its history.  The common man – aam admi – is reeling under the heavy burden of high rates of inflation not seen in recent times.  The leaders of the UPA coalition openly admit that come Friday – they shudder at the prospect of burgeoning inflation figure which shows no signs of respite.  And despite that, the obsession with nuclear deal goes on with an air of insensitivity which has very few parallels?  

The global crude oil price is being touted as the villain of the piece.  However, one is little amused; because, the big guns of globalization are also complaining of outcomes that result from that very process.  There is now incontrovertible proof that speculative investment is a principal feature of the globalization process which was underway since the early–mid seventies.
 

Oil prices' skyrocketing is a phenomenon which is increasingly smacking of being the handiwork of international finance capital that is increasingly turning to trading in oil futures.  This came to be sharply highlighted in the international conference on oil prices in Jeddah on June 22.  This conference attended by 36 countries, registered the presence of all important players who have a stake in the global oil economy.  

Organized by Saudi Arabia – one of the closest US allies in the region – it fell on King Abdullah, the monarch of the kingdom to fire the first salvo.  He thundered against "…..speculators who played a market out of selfish interests".  The other big gun – OPEC President Chakib Khelil – directly charged US and its financial sector for the current spread of crude oil price – which has risen from US $ 70 in August '07 to more than US $ 140 a barrel now.  Khelil hinted the nature of complicity and observed: "A lot of people are talking about the uncertainties about the (oil) reserves. But what about the uncertainties on the dollar?"  

What are the reasons for this inference on speculative nature of the crude price hike?  The first indication that something unusual is happening in the oil market comes out from the fact which The Economist has pointed out - that with the 20-fold increase since 2003, investment in  oil futures have gone up to US $ 260 billion.  This abrupt increase is triggered by the nature of trading of oil futures.  Unlike margin requirements for stocks – upto 50 per cent – the margin here in commodities is a mere 5 to 7 per cent.  With US $ 260 billion, financial sector speculators can take positions of US $ 5 trillion in the futures market.




  Further, oil is internationally traded in New York and London and denominated in US dollars only.  Price fixation in crude has, therefore, shifted away from OPEC to Wall Street. And, behemoths like Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, J P Morgan Chase and Morgan Stanley now rule the roost.  

A US Senate Sub-Committee report from June 2006 blamed the speculators squarely for the rise in oil prices.  The report estimated that speculative purchases of oil futures had added as much as US $ 20-25 per barrel to the then price of US $ 60 per barrel.  In the present context of US $ 140 per barrel would imply a neat US $ 100 to 105/barrel!

And, no doubt, the US government has acted as a facilitator in this obnoxious process which now hurts the aam aadmi in India and elsewhere in the world.  Oil is a unique commodity where increases in production and supply do not appreciably bring down its prices.  But a slight increase in demand triggers a quantum jump.  Till 2006, the US strategic oil reserves were 350 million barrels. Within the last year and a half, this has doubled to 700 million barrels.  One can imagine the impact of this in adding pressure on demand and the consequent prices.  It is the US treasury which has borne US $ 35 billion for building up this additional stock.  

The same Senate Sub-Committee report of 2006 has also pointed out that the US administration has left loophole in the US regulation for oil derivatives trading  which could allow even a `herd of elephants to walk through it'.  At the behest of now defamed energy major Enron, the administration inserted a provision into the commodity futures modernization act of 2000.  This amendment ensures that Commodities Future Trading Commission (CFTC), the US regulator for commodity futures market, which was  earlier overseeing this futures trade will not  exercise oversight of trading of contracts in OTC (over the counter) electronic markets.  With this amendment, overwhelming volume of oil futures trade goes on unregulated in such OTC exchanges.  

That brings us to Jeddah. And wonder of wonders! Taking on Samuel Bodman, the US Energy Secretary, who insisted "there is no evidence that we can find that speculators are driving futures prices"-was our own home-grown globaliser,P.Chidambaram.  The Indian Finance Minister who refused to implement the recommendations of an Indian Parliamentary committee and ban futures trading in 25 agri-food commodities gunned for the oil speculators' blood!  The question that people will ask, will the 'spine' that was displayed in Jeddah remain unaffected by the strategic embrace with US administrations?
 
 3 Comments    Share    Blog      Print
 

Add Your Comment

Join Indiainteracts for free to comment on this story. Have an account already? to comment
3 Comments

It is not strategic embrace, it is seductive embrace, it is embrace to enslave, and the political prostitution beyond national borders gives good revenue for the coffers of the selfish, of course with due percentage of brokerage to the political parties that keep them in citadels of power.

 
nandhivarman - Comments as on 05-07-2008

Mr. Basu I want to ask one question from you. What have you done to control prices? Your party only do dharna strikes and bandth. Do you provide any plan to govt in which you mention how to tackle inflation. If yes, then why govt ignore them? Now you anti national communits withdrawn support from the govt on N-deal, why you dont withdraw on price rise and inflation? The main problem with your party is that China is your main priority not India. That is why you people withdraw support on N-deal not on inflation. I don’t understand how your party after enjoying power for 41/2 years goes to public on 14 july and said this govt. is anti people. Do you think that we are fool. No sir, we are not fools we are just watching your hypocracy.

 
rishiteddy - Comments as on 07-07-2008

Sir,
What you have written about US is true. But you cannot escape responsibility by withdrawing support to UPA and crow that you are saving India from USA.From the beginning you have been supporting a capitalist government of congress.It played its cards well but you are now looking exposed as a supporter of China and Iran and Muslim vote bank.Your leadership in 80s didnot allow Jyothi basu to become PM due to ideological reasons and made Gowda.But again with 60 MPs you lost out. You could have got any ministry of your choice but you lost out. I suggest that you support BJP which is the party of youth and educated middleclass if you realy feel the Nukedeal is anti national.You cannot keep BJP untouchable and expect respect just because some muslims support you.you must have the guts to say that Muslim clerics were wrong in calling the deal anti national. is Abdul Kalam anti national? You guys get out of your cocoon sir.

 
captainjohann - Comments as on 10-07-2008







     

Durai...

Rasikkum Seemane ...

Mahesh Saranya Mat...


Kanagavel Kakka...

Saroja...

Dhanam...

Durai Audio Launch ...

Saroja Promo songs ...

Aatta Nayagan movi ...


Homam trailer ...

Harshini Ramani ...

Ganesha speaks Ast ...
     


About | Content providers | Support | Beta feedback | Report abuse | Contact us | Careers | FAQ