| Published on 07-04-2008 In National |
| Viewed 1408 times |
| CPI(M) will not allow neo-liberal policies |
|
|
Written by Nilotpal Basu |
The 19th Congress of Communist Party of India (Marxist) is just over. Held in Coimbatore in Tamil Nadu, this has attracted public and media attention perhaps has never before. How is it that the CPI (M) has become so news worthy?
The last Congress of the Party had taken place in New Delhi just a year after the formation of the UPA Government at the Centre in 2005. Obviously, the relationship between the Government and the Left – though defined – had to yet play out sufficiently as to enable people at large to really fathom its subtleties and nuances. Far less was the impact of this complex interface being understood in terms of national policy making. The process of coalition Governments is now very much into the second decade of its existence. After the brief interregnum of the National Front Government led by V.P. Singh – the ongoing coalition process starting with the United Front Government of 1996 this is the third coalition, which is in office at the Centre. However, the nature of the present coalition is somewhat different. This is because while the Congress is the principal party of the UPA, but the coalition itself which has been formed post-election is minority and has to depend on the Left support. This provides the Left and the CPI (M) a greater leeway in articulating its policy preferences and impacting national decision making. Of course, these influences are more pronounced on issues which require legislative action. However, even on issues which did not require such legislative changes, the CPI(M) has been able to make its presence felt on crucial questions of which the most notable has been the recent debate on Indo-US Nuclear Deal. In fact, for the last almost four years the mainstream media has been claiming that Left is playing a spoilsport, particularly in the process of the economic reform process. Is this complaint justified? Unlike the earlier coalitions – the Left has not only refused to be part of the Government, but also part of the UPA coalition itself. And the support of the Left is based on the National Common Minimum Programme (NCMP). The NCMP which was based on the popular mandate of 2004 rejecting the most pronounced orientation of neo-liberal ideas encapsulated in the perverse 'Shining India, the Congress's similar policy inclination could not be completely exhausted. Therefore, the Left and particularly the CPI (M)'s explicit emphasis has been to oppose these neo-liberal preferences. The fundamental clash of approach between these two forces was well-known and their playing out as it has happened over the last four years should not, therefore, have been surprising. In fact, this fundamental policy difference was the heart of Left's decision for refusing to become a part of the UPA coalition. But at the same time, the Left recognized the disastrous consequences of the continuous shift of the economic and political processes in India since 1989 towards the right where the RSS-BJP was on its ascendance till 2004. Therefore, the Left's tactic combined the pre-requisite of fighting the dangers of imperialism, communalism and neo-liberal policies to ensure the continuation of the Government yet to arrest the drift towards the right.
It is in this context of successfully carrying out this multiple policy battle that the recent CPI(M) Congress had taken place. That the right wing forces, whether the RSS-BJP or the US which wanted to undermine India's independent foreign policy initiative – by making it a subordinate ally – their disapproval is quite obvious. Additionally within the Government those who would like to push the neo-liberal paradigm forward were also singularly unhappy. This has made it clear that neither the Congress nor the BJP can actually support policies which are opposed to imperialism, communalism, and neo-liberalism and author a direction which can safeguard the basic interests of the Indian people. Therefore, in the run up to the CPI(M) Congress – the slogan for forging a third alternative had attracted a widespread attention. And, equally the mainstream media has also displayed a singular lack of comprehension on this slogan. Journalists and observers have tended to view this alternative, essentially as an electoral tactics. However, the CPI(M) has been very clear on this count. It was keen to put in place a policy platform which would highlight the need for secularism, independent foreign policy and a role of the Government in addressing issues like agrarian crisis, social security, employment generation and affordable basic requirements like food, clothing, shelter, education and health. While this process of forging and evolving the third alternative may take sometime and follow struggles on such crucial issues which will also involve popular mobilization, the Left and the CPI(M) will not flinch from making suitable electoral tactics to strengthen this process. The CPI(M) Congress has successfully unified its ranks on this crucial question. The CPI(M) Congress was also being watched with interest because people wanted to find out as to how it resolved the requirements of Left-led Governments of providing people centric alternatives in global and national context where neo-liberal globalisation was the order of the day. On this count as well, the CPI(M) has been able to formulate – on the basis of the long and rich historical experience starting with the EMS Government of 1957 to the present post globalisation phase and the continued success in West Bengal and Tripura in successive elections – to engage with the constraints of the existing reality and to remain true to pro-people alternative and restructure center-state relations in the age of globalisation. Finally, the people also were keenly interested as to how the new generation of leaders of the CPI(M) would deal with physical absence of Jyoti Basu and Harkishan Singh Surjeet who are the last two of those nine stalwarts who founded the CPI(M). By ensuring that Jyoti Basu will continue to advise the Party and Surjeet's link with the Central Committee will be maintained, the leadership of the Party has shown their collective wisdom in achieving continuity with the requirements of the changing world. That the Party is now poised for addressing the people's concern is more than apparent. If those who do not appreciate this development are unhappy, it is an altogether different matter.
|
|
|
|
|
| Social Web | |
| |
|
|
| |