Register/ Login   
Submit Mobile RSS Java Script Feed  
Home Blogs Spotlight Videos Movies Cartoon Photos Submit Media Space  Feed Directory 
World |  National |  Entertainment |  General |  Columnist


Published on 17-03-2008 In National
Viewed 1798 times
Rapscallions' ruse
Written by
Cho Ramaswamy
The storm centred within the precincts of Chidambaram Nataraja temple seems to have abated for the time being.
 
But, it is quite another matter that this has exposed a serious attempt to shake the foundations of one faith.
 
The issue revolving around a few having been prevented from chanting Tamil hymns while stationed at the divine Golden Assembly violating rules prescribed by the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department (administered by the Government of Tamil Nadu) is still a sore point.
 
The world at large has been told that there was a 'tripartite' stoning fracas between the traditional Dikshitars who control the shrine, a few outsiders and the police when efforts were made to offer worship in Tamil in the arena in question.
Arrests followed.
 
After being threatened with dire consequences, the orthodox priests allowed the chosen few led by one Arumugasamy who insisted that they had the right to utter the prayers in the local language inside the sacred hall, period.
 
However, the more important questions – [a] whether the government's HR & CE wing possessed the entitlement to enforce such a measure and [b] if so to what extent – remain unanswered.
 
Under the debris created after the aftermath of the 'privileged protest' a few truths have been buried.
 
Nobody had objected to the singing of Tamil hymns (Thevaram) from the hallowed platform. Actually the Dikshitars do so every day as part of the prayer routine. There were no precedents in the temple's history to allow anybody else – including Brahmins – to loudly pray in any language while being positioned in the Golden Assembly other than the temple's hereditary administrators – viz. the Dikshitars.
 
But, virtually anyone can have an unhindered Darshan from the spot.
 
In other words, to say that Tamil worship by others outside the clan of the Dikshitars inside the temple is banned – is a patent falsehood.
 
This apart, the HR & CE Department has no locus standi to control the affairs in the Chidambaram shrine. The government's order appointing an Executive Officer to run the affairs of the temple was struck down by the courts, which said clearly that the Dikshitars belong to a religious denomination.



Subsequently the order was withdrawn.
 
Another aspect to be borne in mind is that the state's statute only allows the HR & CE Department's supervision of the administration but does not accord it any privilege to interfere in religious activities.
 
Therefore, the government cannot enforce any measure in this temple.
 
So, now there is a different query being raised.
 
Can Tamils not offer worship in their mother tongue in their own state?
 
What about the Thevaram hymns sung by the Dikshitars? Were they uttered in Esperanto – the only man made globally foreign language known to the smallest minority in the world?
 
That those underlining the supremacy of Tamil in the temple improperly pronounced the prayers and had to be prompted by the very Dikshitars they opposed is, of course, an ironical aside.
 
Is such a slurred slur the pristine language called Tamil?
 
That said, why can't these who so valiantly underline the need of Tamil in anything and everything insist on it being the medium of prayers in mosques – replacing Arabic?
 
Lest it be misunderstood that this is an argument in favour of governments' interference in personal praying preferences, let me make my stand clear.
 
When radical regimes respect regimens alien to our culture, why interweave indigenous idiomatic invocations with irreverent, irrelevant snobbery in the name of secularism?
 
Non-believers asserting a right to propitiate progressiveness in a sacred spot is not only sacrilege but also unjust.
 
And that is precisely what had happened in Chidambaram.
 
Certain godless souls arrayed a few belonging to a faith that derides Hinduism at the Nataraja temple. The Tamil Nadu government has derived vicarious pleasure in ensuring that such a travesty of justice took place.
 
Impotent inability on the part of the reign to dislodge the faith by introducing Executive Officers has resulted in its attempted execution in the name of the local lingua franca.
 
Rudiments of religion have been used as a ruse by ruling arrogant atheists under the garb of propagating Tamil.


(Translated from Thuglak by TSV Hari)
 
 8 Comments    Share    Blog      Print
 

Add Your Comment

Join Indiainteracts for free to comment on this story. Have an account already? to comment
8 Comments

I’ve no insight to add regarding Tamil politics, but since your post is all about languages and the right to use them, I would kindly request that you avoid bashing other people’s languages — Esperanto, in this case — while making your point.

You seem to think that Esperanto speakers make up what is “known to be the smallest minority in the world”, but if you check your facts, you’ll find that estimates of number of speakers range from 500,000 to about 2 million. In other words, about as many speakers as Gondi, or Konkani, or Manipuri, or numerous other linguistic minorities in India. All of these languages, relatively small as they are next to English and Hindi, still come in the top 2% of world languages in terms of number of speakers.

 
timsk - Comments as on 17-03-2008

This is what Wikipedia has to say about the language Esperanto..
====================================================================================================
Esperanto has had continuous usage by a community estimated at between 100,000 and 2 million speakers for over a century. By most estimates, there are approximately a thousand native speakers. No country has adopted the language officially.
====================================================================================================

It claims there are only 1000 native speakers of this language and not widely used (top 2% of the world languages) as you claim.

regards
kumar

 
kumar - Comments as on 17-03-2008

Mention of esperanto, was only for illustrating a point and no way for offending speakers of the language.
Here is a guy raising his voice against even an unintentional degrade of his language and the guys in TN are not even concerned about disgusting attempts of atheist Govt and MK’s disciples to cause denigration of a culture, language and customs of an immensely magnificient religion of Sanathana Dharma ! What a shame !
Hindus have been long lulled into sleep by continuous injection of of praise, being ‘tolerant’ and ‘peaceful’ in the world, and have discarded any form of protest or wimper that is understood and appreciated by anti-Hindus.
It is high time, people like Cho led the legal battle, instead of simply writing articles !
At least provide full support to Swamy or similar persons who dare to strike at injustice against Hinduism.

 
nathappan - Comments as on 17-03-2008

Peace!
While there was no hidden agenda to belittle Esperanto, the fact remains that it is a “globally foreign language.”
Shorn of legalese, this means that this language is not an ethnic tongue of any nation.
It was created by a man called LL Zamenhof in 1887.
To this day, Esperanto has not been adopted as a spoken language of any country.
And juxtapose this to the classical status of Tamil - which is said to be several thousand years old!
And hymns in this classical living language were mispronounced in Tamil Nadu!
Enjoy the satire and overlook the Double Dutch passed off as comments.
I wonder how many are Geeks (correct spelling and not a typo, please) going to spring to the defence of the language of Netherlands, a nation that loves its football, beer and cheese much more than a game alien to its soil below sea level called cricket!
Cheers!
TSV Hari

 
tsvenkatahari - Comments as on 18-03-2008

Divert the people’s thought from important issues; mainstream media will do the rest, the result - Ordo Ab Chao; Create an order out of chaos, an order which the rulers’ rulers would definitely like.

 
veritas - Comments as on 18-03-2008

I think that the defence of Esperanto springs from the fact that no-one would attack Dutch as a living language, yet, out of ignorance, the commonly held assertion is, that, “no-one speaks” Esperanto. This is untrue.

Your comment that Esperanto was “created” illustrates my point, the language was initiated in 1887, not created! During a short period of 121 years, this language is now within the top 100 languages worldwide, according to the CIA yearbook. Esperanto is a living language. It is the 17th language most used by Wikipedia. Even the Beijing Olympics has an Esperanto translator.

Can I ask you not to support ignorance?

 
Brian - Comments as on 18-03-2008

tsvenkatahari, brian,timsk - you morons are missing the point of the article. who cares about eperanto in this context - discuss the article and stop nit-picking. we bow to your knowledge on Esperanto!!! wow!

 
mksucks - Comments as on 18-03-2008

Dear mr. Cho,
Will either you or TVS Hari, your transator, clarify one aspect of the issue?. You seems to be taunting the Dravidian rulers of the state, why dont you try “this or taht’ in the mosques and churches?
May I turn the table on you? why dont you Aryans go and recite your Sanscrit slokas and Vedas in the Mosques and Churches? You claim all the authority when it cmes to taunting the the Dravidians with this theory. For once start a movement that Deepavali should be celebrated in the mosques also.

 
ammoorkmani - Comments as on 06-06-2008







     

Seval...

Anthony Yaar...

Durai...


Vaaranam Aayiram...

Adada Enna Azhagu...

Abhium Nanum...

Mantra Trailer ...

Kuruvi 150 Days Ce ...

Anthony Yaar Audio ...


Seval Audio Launch ...

A.R.Rahman Launche ...

Gopal Srinivasan T ...
     


About | Content providers | Support | Beta feedback | Report abuse | Contact us | Careers | FAQ